Ha Joon Chang exposes the main ideas of his book Bad Samaritans, namely that historically states have developed and industrialized by making policy interventions related to industry protection, tariffs and subsidies and not by opening their markets to free trade. Chang elaborates on the examples of Japan, the US, Singapore and Germany amongst others to show that an interventionist path to development has been the regularity and not an anomaly. In the end of the lecture, he argues that they idea of a level playing field should be replaced by a trade order that accounts for differences in power and economic capacities of different countries. The last 20 minutes are questions and answers.

In 18th century Europe figures such as Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Friedrich List and Jean Baptiste Colbert developed theories regarding international trade, which either embraced free trade seeing it as a positive sum game or recommended more cautious and strategic approaches to trade seeing it as a potential danger and a rivalry and often as a zero-sum game. What about today?

Quelles sont les opportunités et quels sont les risques des accords commerciaux de nouvelle génération négociés actuellement par l'UE (CETA avec le Canada, JEFTA avec le Japon,...) ? Cécilia Bellora, économiste et ingénieure agronome, CEPII Karine Jacquemart, directrice générale, Foodwatch (sous réserve) Charles de Marcilly, responsable du bureau de Bruxelles, Fondation Robert Schuman Katheline Schubert, professeure d’économie, Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne - PSE Modération : Dominique Rousset, journaliste à France culture

In this classic work of economic history and social theory, Karl Polanyi analyzes the economic and social changes brought about by the "great transformation" of the Industrial Revolution.

An ideal type of a pluralistic book. Instead of arguing for one specific interpretation of a complex phenomenon, the authors present six different views on globalisation. Roberts and Lamp carefully balance the different perspectives, presenting the merits of each.